Monday, November 23, 2009


Why i am talking about constitution and democracy?Then i thought if every one is discussing,why shouldn't i ?I am not doing any crime ?When there is no importance of any language then the words are also not important.Language doesn't creates Science & Technology but it definitely created literature,history and social science.Constitution is also there in a language.Constitution says all languages are equal.English & Hindi are official languages.So we can say that one language which is our own and the other which is a foreign language and we have inherit it from the Britishers are sailing in the same boat.English & Hindi are the languages through which we fought for our independence.

But through one political strategy Hindi was made as the only official language or 'THE NATIONAL LANGUAGE' of our country.So from this political step Hindi became enemy of the other languages of our country.This was the perfect Political strategy to divide other languages.So due to this step we saw a bad reaction on 9 November 2009 in Maharashtra State Assembly.This reaction was respect to our Constitution or to state assembly or to the common public that only politicians can explain.This cannot be explained by priests of different community or by the common people who have elected these so called politicians to the legislative assembly.

In Maharashtra Assembly we saw not only in three but oath was taken in four languages.In Marathi,Sanskrit,Hindi & English.Pledge was to be taken in Marathi language only not just because it is the state and working language of maharastra but also of the Order of the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena Chief Raj Thackeray.Raj Thackeray has ordered that if members will not take oath in marathi then they would be punished.My Question is who is Raj Thackeray,to give orders against the constitition to the members of the legislative assembly.If u have requested thn that is all right.It is against our law that the person who is not a mamber of the state assembly is giving orders to the members of the assembly.Our constitution give right to the members of the assembly to take oath in any of the different assembly mentioned in the constituttion of our assembly.THE NEW HITLER OF MAHARASHTRA was doing many activities in a week against our Constitution,but the government was helpless.The congress govenment of maharastra did not take any action against THE NEW HITLER OF MAHARASHTRA.
Why THACKERAY FAMILY is angry from hindi?Raj Thackeray has shown his angers not only to Hindi but also to the people who speaks Hindi.?He dont understand that Marathi language has adapted Devanagari Lippi.It was done just so that Hindi & Marathi speaking people can sail on same boat.In fact Hindi was supported by Gandhi,Tilak,Swami Dayanand & Parakar also.Then why his angers are that much that his party members can even beat Abu Azmi?

Our country respect Human Beings.Not only Maharashtians but North Indian also.From all over our country students come to north india for higher education.It implies to Medical higher education also.Infact non of them have ever raised any language issue and nor of any state or region wise issue.I think Thackeray Family dosent know it?But if in any case they know it they dont want to understand.They are directly or indirectly dividing our country.Politicians are spreading fire in our country.Just because trough that fire only they can cook thier food.Now i think that politcians are more selfish then also to the till date most selfish Indra.Please Pardon me but Mohammad Ali Jinnah also showed this type of angers against language.Infact ?Jinnah also asked the people of eastern pakistan to speak only urdu.He at that time 'Bangla-Vangla kuch nahi,Urdu sab kuch' which means that people you should speak only Urdu leave the Bangla.Raj Thackeray is also moving on the same desety road.We can say that MNS has indirectly thrown fire,whosoever will support him will injurd himself in the fire.

They have forgotten that when peshwa were thrown out from Pune by the East India Company,North Indians only helped to maintain there dignity.Peshwa were supported only by North Indians.Till now also we have the proof of that masical in the bethur.They have also forgotten that Tatya Tope,Nana Rao where more North indians then the Mrathi's.They speak Marathi & Hindi both.Now also Maharashtians who lives in north India speaks Hindi & Marathi both. Nobody orders them to speak only Hindi in north India states.

Infact Bal Thackeray in his daily newspaper 'Samna' wrote that Abu Azmi has done a crime.?Directly or indirectly he supported Raj Thackeray.This is really very very bad.This undoubtadly shows that Blood is more dark than water.Brother's -son and language is bigger than the constitution of our country.?It is really strange that such a senior politician dose not said anything against the people who taken the oath in English.Leave Bal Thackeray,where where BJP and RSS.What happened to them?Why where they silent.This can be termed as MURDER OF OUR NATIONAL LANGUAGE.When some Mulana of Muslim community passed the Fatwa against 'VANDE MATRAM' they all were responding against that,but when our language was murdered where were they.Why they did not react.

Language is not real or unreal.Nobody can ever stop any language.Thackeray Family languages react more than the human beings of any state.Once in the /British Parliament there was an order that whosoever will speak English instead of French will loose his/her life.But here the ?Big Question is that did they succeed in doing any harm to English?Languages make their way of its own and remove all the barriers in their way itself.Hindi our National Language is doing the same.It is Moving with the respect to the other sister Languages.

Friday, November 20, 2009


One great man has rightly said that 'Indian Politics is Bad'.I completly support this view.This is completely right that our country's politics is very very dirty.But the big question is why? Our country politics is bad and dirty just because of politicians like kalyan singh of Uttar Pradesh.Talking about this man who is former chief minister of the the biggest state of India.Yes Uttar Pradesh is the biggest state of India.The state which has produced most number of Prime Minister's of our country.But the irony is in today's time the state is still bigger but now we don't know Uttar Pradesh as the biggest state of our country but we know it as the state which produces the worst politicians of our country. And i can undoubtedly say that kalyan Singh is one of them.He was the chief minister of uttar pradesh at the time when barbari mosque was lifted.At that time he was in Bharatiya Janta Party.I as a Hindu never feel good that the mosque is no more in Ayodhya where ram mandir was there years back.Infact i felt very bad when this incident take place. I am saying Kalyan Singh as the dirty politician who makes our country's politics dirty because he is really dirty. Talking about his kind of politics.He was firstly inBharatiya Janta Party.Infact he was there Chief Minister also.But when he quit the party in 1999 he stated barbari masacal wrong infact he even said that Mr Vajpaye dosen't wanted him to stay in party.He even said many bad words to many of the senior leaders of Bharatiya Janta Party. But after some years when he rejoin the party he praised those leaders whom he has said bad words.In fact he even now stated that destroying barbari was correct.Then in febrary 2009 when he again quit the Bharatiya Janta Party he as we saw earlier again stated Bharatiya Janta Party as the worst party and even said that he will never return to the party.

And after quitting he was independent but his son join samajvadi party and even got a big post.And he was indirectly in samajvadi party only as he was present in each and every programme of S.P. Recently on 14 November 2009 he again showed his dirty as poltics as his son quit the samajvadi party and he now stated samajvadi party as the worst party and even stated Mulyan singh as his enemy.And the big thing is that he is now praising RSS and even saying that Bharatiya Janta Party is a good party.This is because now he has to return to Bharatiya Janta Party.Because he now don't have other options. Overall i want to say that we should try to vote and follow the leaders who are good politicians and don't do dirty politics.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Safin prolongs career with Paris victory

Marat Safin's career continues for at least one more match after his opening round victory in Paris.

Marat Safin's career continues for at least one more match after his opening round victory in Paris.

Marat Safin avoided the ignominy of heading into retirement with a first-round defeat in the Paris Masters -- after seeing off Thierry Ascione in a third-set tie-break.

Former world number one Safin, playing his final tournament before calling time on his playing career, held his nerve to progress to the second round with a 6-4 4-6 7-6 victory over the Frenchman, saving three match points in the process.

The 29-year-old two-time grand slam winner, and three-time tournament winner, will now have to defeat sixth-seedd U.S. Open champion Juan Martin del Potro if he is to progress further.

Elsewhere, Ivo Karlovic cruised into the second round after seeing off the challenge of Uruguay's Pablo Cuevas.

The giant Croatian was typically dominant on serve with Cuevas failing to gain a single break point. Karlovic took the first set on a tie-break before completing a 7-6 6-4 triumph to set up a meeting with Swedish ninth seed Robin Soderling.

There was disappointment for the home crowd in Bercy as Frenchman Paul-Henri Mathieu was forced to retire from his match against Viktor Troicki when 7-6 3-0 down.

Italian Andreas Seppi proved too strong for Phillip Kohlschreiber, winning 6-3 6-3, while 2005 winner Tomas Berdych edged out qualifier Vincent Millot 6-3 7-6.

The top eight seeds will join the tournament on Tuesday after being handed opening round byes.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Did Obama win Nobel for not being Bush?

Did President Obama land a Nobel peace prize at such an early stage of his presidency simply because he's not George W. Bush?

Diplomatic circles are certainly not dismissing such a notion and a "surprised and humbled" Obama has himself agreed that the award (for which nominations had to be submitted only two weeks after his inauguration) can hardly have been a recognition of anything he has yet accomplished. It is a prize for aspiration rather than achievement.

One of the best deliberate laughs Bush obtained in his last days in office came when he expressed himself pleased at the street reception during his attendance at a NATO summit in Romania.

"A lot of the crowd were waving… some of them with all five fingers," he said.

Bush was acknowledging that many in Old Europe at least could not wait to say goodbye to a man whom they saw as a Cold Warrior at heart, the president who had led the world into a disastrous intervention in Iraq and a man heading a gas-guzzling nation who was not prepared to help the world cope with climate change.

For many Europeans, the chief concern through the long, drawn-out race for the Democratic nomination and through the presidential election was that the result should give them anybody but Bush.